Female Led Relationships

I read a self-professed ‘malesub’ stating that he would train his sons to be submissive to women. He would try to force the orientation on them, not enable them to seek fulfillment.

The idea of a father teaching his boys to want to be a woman’s slave is quite disgusting. Should someone really try one can only hope the children are taken away from him.

This is a good example of the kind of damnable consequences belief in female superiority can lead too.

Robert Hardcastle writes:

Females should rule the world. I am a man that truly knows this

Robert, just how do you know this?

I think a female led world with us men submissive to them should be the way we all live. Women should be in controle of everything from the family to the highest goverment agencies. Once women do they should take our (men) rights away.This way women will have the power they should have.Now if i could finde a woman like this to give control to.

Long ago as he himself has admitted William Bond saw some femdom porn and it changed his life.

Through ebooks, vanity press publishing, websites, blogs usenet postings he has been an ardent propagandist for female supremacy. And been laughed away from every active publish venue he’s participated in.

Screwball history and freakish sexual psychology are neither new nor rare. But the knots this man has twisted his mind in an effort to turn his masochism into a social blueprint for a better world have all the mark of the crank.

He even founded a church. While those of us who love dominant women do indeed worship them there is a border that sanity shouldn’t cross.

Priestess Teaches Slaves How to Pray Under Difficult Circumstances

The final ritual to achieve total humiliation. After a few strokes from her whip, the priestess has the slave rolled over on his back face up and told that in order to avoid a long and painfully severe whipping he must pray to the goddess as well as beg the priestess for mercy. But, as he tries to speak, she presses her bare foot firmly over his mouth in an effort to force him to struggle in vain to continue voicing his pleas for mercy. Unfortuneatly, she wants to “feel” as well as hear the muffled prayers and pleas for mercy coming from her “footstool.” Her foot continues to follow his moving head to find his mouth. Finally he tires and gives up his struggle to avoid her foot in his mouth. Some women have said that the vibration of a helpless man’s pleading lips moving against their bare foot is so intoxicating as to cause the action to continue for hours.

EXCERPTS FROM THE ESSEMIAN MANIFESTO

His S&M manifesto reveals that really he is just another guy who wants his masochistic jollies. Pity he couldn’t get them without going off the deep end.

By Mule:

The reasons girls are superior to boys (at least between the ages of 6 and 12 – more or less - sort of).

Some of the reasons have already been given: the things society expects of children are based on the feminine traits rather than the masculine traits (see my list concerning grade school).

Girls can go either way: they can be in ballet class, and they can play softball and nobody cares. They can wear dresses or they can wear shorts or jeans and nobody cares. They can have long or short hair with or without ribbons and nobody cares. Put a boy in ballet class or put him in a dress or put pretty pink ribbons in his hair and he is ridiculed. It’s a dual standard: girls can be anything they want. Boys have to be boys.

It’s a fact, girls mature earlier than boys. Even staunch religions recognize this fact: a girl bat-mitzvahs at 12 a boy bar-mitzvahs at 13.

Girls mature physically faster. I have a picture of my cousin and me at age 9. She is a month younger than me and a head taller. She has since grown into a relatively tall woman (5’ 9”) and now I am taller, but at that age, she was a giantess.

Girls also tend to grow continuously while boys “sprut.” So boys lose whatever grace they attain while trying to grow into their bodies.

But the biggest reason girls are superior to boys at this age is that they form alliances easier. This is man’s downfall. No, not “us” man, but our cousin the Neanderthals. In a one-on-one competition, my money is on the Neanderthal. He’s tougher and better at surviving against nature. However, our cousins are extinct. Why? Because while as individuals they were superior, as a group they were inferior and rarely formed coalitions greater than an extended family. Homo sapiens went on to form tribes, city-states and nation-states.

In a not-so-much-more-current example, I can recall an incident at the playground. The girls were on the swings, a girl would not get off her swing until there was another girl waiting to get on. She would jump off, and hold the swing for the next girl, handing it to her. The boys never got a chance.

Boys compete, girls clan.

Some of this is stronger in other cultures. In Japan it is not uncommon seeing 80-year-old women toddling down the street together holding hands. They did the same thing when they were three. One of the cultural clashes between American GI and Japanese bride was that he came home at night to be with her. It interfered with her time with her girlfriends. How dare he check up on her!

Both sexes eventually grow out of it. They learn how to adjust to a so-called adult society. Maybe we would be better off if we still did at least some things “just for fun.”

Barbara Ehrenreich commenting on a New York Times article by Susan Faludi:

I share Faludi’s glee — up to a point. Surely no one will ever dare argue that women lack the temperament for political combat. But by running a racially-tinged campaign, lying about her foreign policy experience, and repeatedly seeming to favor McCain over her Democratic opponent, Clinton didn’t just break through the “glass floor,” she set a new low for floors in general, and would, if she could have got within arm’s reach, have rubbed the broken glass into Obama’s face.

…

Hillary Clinton smashed the myth of innate female moral superiority in the worst possible way — by demonstrating female moral inferiority. We didn’t really need her racial innuendos and free-floating bellicosity to establish that women aren’t wimps. As a generation of young feminists realizes, the values once thought to be uniquely and genetically female — such as compassion and an aversion to violence — can be found in either sex, and sometimes it’s a man who best upholds them.

Hillary’s Gift to Women

A few years ago a noted physicist equated popular science books and elementary science education with telling lies to children. Since most people don’t know the specialized mathematics, arcane measurements and abstruse tests behind most advanced scientific theories they after reading a book or taking a couple of science courses are under the sad impression that they know far, far more than they do.

Take this:

To create a male, a copy of the Female template, the Mother’s body must recognise the broken chromosome present within the male’s sperm which has entered Her body. A Woman’s chromosomes are XX. Two perfectly formed shapes which convey Her characteristics to the fetus. The male’s chromosomes can either be XX (thus ensuring a Female birth) or XY (conferring his damage to the fetus and causing a male). An X chromosome has all four “limbs” stemming form the central nexus. The Y has three limbs stemming form the center, the fourth one having been sheared off. A Y is nothing more than a broken or damaged, mutated X. It is the male of the species which confers sex to the offspring because damage results from damage, not from Perfection. Once the damaged chromosome is identified, the Female body bathes the developing fetus in hormones which halt the development of Female characteristics and force the formation of the inferior male structures.

“You *are* the Weakest Link! Goodbye!” and the baby is consigned to the role Nature designed for it. Observe the human body and you will see that the male form contains within it the structures of the Female, but mutated, withered and/or altered.

Many people repeat this weird balderdash and variations because it - in their minds - justifies zany theories of female supremacy.

One can only imagine what a gifted geneticist like Richard Dawkins would think of he encountered this.

Obviously two gay women engaging in D/s makes nonsense of female superiority.

And what of two gay men? Are their passions unworthy and untrue? How about loving queer authority?

Female supremacy may make for hot wanking and is best left to that.

Many people who use words like female supremacy actually believe in political and social equality for all genders. This isn’t to say that they aren’t dominant; don’t exercise power over men - enslave them.

Laura Goodwin is a stellar example:

Now I’ll tell you what gynosupremacists aren’t: we aren’t sexists. All men and women are equal under the Goddess. SHE is the Mother of us all, and loves us all equally. In my religion, each person is divinely authorized to be an agent for the Goddess or God. We assert that the body, the world, and life itself is sacred, deserving respect and preservation, and yes, I do want to see those values reflected in my daily life.

Gynosupremacy

For her gynosupremacy is a means of seeking balance in dealing with the legacies of millennia of patriarchy. And I suspect she finds it a beautiful metaphor.

On the web the bulk of hard-line gynosupremacists are mostly professional dominatrices. And the online and telephone sex workers seeking monetary tribute fill the fattest slice of that.

For them female supremacy is a form of patter: the better to milk men of their money. While the majority of PSOs are honorable some are ruthless in taking advantage of lonely submissive men.

Elise Sutton is the most famous advocate of female superiority and the best know writer on female domination.

From the Wikipedia:

Elise Sutton is the author of a website dedicated to personal relationships where the woman is dominant and the man is submissive. She is a self proclaimed Libertarian, Christian, and Female Supremacist. …

It should be pointed out that Sutton refuses to make her true identity known, perhaps for privacy reasons, however her anonymity raises the question to whether it is a single individual that runs her site and writes her books.

—

Her critics claim that Sutton’s arguments are based on misinterpretation of psychological, biological, and religious principles. Most of Sutton’s cited evidence comes from anecdotal accounts as a counselor for BDSM couples and testimonials from those within the BDSM community.

Have you heard about Elise Sutton? She is a psychologist who says that men are made to be servants of women, and that men are weak, and women need worship from men, and men have the natural instict tu fulfil women´s desires, women are better, etc etc etc…what do you think?

Yahoo! Answers

Sutton attempted to validate her espousal of female superiority through the use of anecdotes, sociological speculation and dubious bits of history. Aping scholarship without achieving it.

Elise Sutton

And your opinion?

Do you think women are better than men?

• Smarter?
• Wiser?
• Kinder?
• More Humane?

Or are males and females fundamentally equal?

A couple of weeks ago I saw a photograph of a shrine a man had erected to a ProDomme he often sees.

The other night I ran into one of the wackiest websites I know of: Woman Thou Art God.

The Cbelians are big on woman as divine (and piss in their men’s mouths daily to prove it).

And let us not forget the Service of Mankind Church, on some level part of William Bond’s feverish female supremacy fantasies.

So there are plenty of examples of the divine feminine in a crass and amusing sense. (And I’m not even mentioning the more obvious commercial goddess sites.)

What would you do if your wife - or girlfriend - that you should now pray to her as a deity. If she told you that he was literally a goddess and holy?

All manner of males claim to embrace this belief. What do you think of it?

Call me cynical but I suspect this Craigslisting is just a indirect personal ad:

I am an advanced degree professional, male, divorced and age 58 and I am a very passionate believer in Female Supremacy and true and real male servitude/slavery to Women (I am serious); I seek a Woman who shares that philosophy to collaborate with and write short stories and perhaps a full length novel (may or may not be erotic); pay open and negotiable;

Ruined orgasms is the key phrase bringing the most traffic from search engines.

Not a big surprise. A number of the runner up terms involve orgasm denial and enforced male chastity. Perpetually popular topics in Femdom. That is why so many telephone dominatrices make a living forbidding men to have an orgasm. Though rendering an orgasm unsatisfying is certainly extra mean and cruel.

The second most popular topic is female superiority.

Guess you guys are looking for matriarchal fascists who ensure you have as little physical sexual satisfaction as possible.

In your fantasies anyway.