It has been suggested that a female led man should consider signing a so-called
The man is to sign away all his property, financial assets, control of the money he earns. It has even been advised that he destroy his personal credit as a way of insuring his dependency on his wife.
And most alarmingly that the man declare himself incompetent.
This helpless, needy male creature is created with the supposed goal of fomenting romance.
- But how many marriages – female led or not – last forever?
- What becomes of a husband who has lost all skills of financial, personal management if his wife is hit by a truck?
- These agreements wouldn’t last a day in a court of law: they aren’t legally binding.
Does this really sound like the loving basis of wedded bliss?
Originally posted 2008-05-03 15:41:22.
Related posts:
- Do You, Did You Have a Blog? Some female led blogs are lies, others grow silent for...
- Wife Conversion Men who try to convert their wife into a domme,...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Loading ...
I am a single male 53 never married no kids and retired.I never married because I know in my heart I am a slave put here to serve my superior sex the woman.Yes the woman is superior to me.If it was not for women no slaves would ever be born.I believe in total enslavement for the rest of my life.My goddess can use me as she sees fit.Because slavery is not about pleasing me but my owner.As a slave I have no rights or freedom.My one and only purpose is to please her and do as ordered by my owner.
Another aspect of this is a videotaped and signed confession of criminal wrongdoing, with a promise to pay restitution by working off the amount. These can be notarised, and the confession can be turned over to the police if the slave fails. Jail time can occur if the lady presses charges.
They are not binding, but a prenuptial agreement would be. If before the wedding day the male transferred all his assets to his wife, and all his income was put in her accounts during the marriage, and the agreement said that in the event of a divorce, each party would keep all assets in his/her name, and which he/she purchased, then that would be very binding, so if he divorced her, he’d have absolutely nothing, since his fomer assets would be “her” premarital assets, and she’d own all the bank accounts, and would have purchased all the property during the marriage, so it would all be hers. You can create very binding pre-nuptial agreements, but not after you are married. I’m sure some dominant women use it to strip men of their assets, whether they marry them or not, and you’d have to ba a fool to enter into such an agreement unless you had been with the woman for years. It is very exciting to know that you are totally dependent on the female, and are “forced” to be her slave, but you really need to be careful.
Another method would be to travel to a casino and write an agreement which is witneessed, ackowledging that you had lost big and she had won big, and had loaned you $50,000 or so, and you will pay it back by depositing your checks into her account, and she’ll give you room and board, in exchange for doing all her domestic tasks at her home. Then you are stuck, unless you want to file bankruptcy, since that’s a valid debt if it’s in a state where gambling is legal. The power of submission makes the idea of entering into binding agreements almost irresistible, and I’m sure many subs have been taken for a great deal, particualrly since they are too embarrassed to admit to why they did it, and even if they do, a court isn’t going to be impressed, if you have a valid promissory note signed by impartial witnesses.
I’ve heard of this happening with male dommes and female subs as well. If you truly love someone would you really want them to suffer if something happened to you? I think it is taking things way too far.
[...] Earlier: Interspousal Agreements. [...]