Comments on: The Great MCD Debate

By: Paul

Paul — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:27:19 +0000

I’m a male sub that has done it both ways, with a chastity device, and without, relying just on willpower and “mental” chastity. I find it more powerful and more meaningful to remain orgasm-free without the MCD, because then I have to make the effort, constantly, everyday.

And I don’t masturbate/cheat without a MCD — I simply learned not to, over a period of years. I don’t cum without permission.

I’m sure that there are many men who prefer the device or have to have it because they lack self-control, but I’m not one of them.

It may depend on the amount of time between orgasms, though. I’ve never had to go more than 2 weeks.

By: doris

doris — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:20:22 +0000

I had attempted to wear a Choirboy CD but this was not successful.

I am in total agreement that MCD should be required of all men who report to and adore the woman.

By: Dev

Dev — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:49:56 +0000

Yuck.

That’s all I have to say.

By: Lisa M.

Lisa M. — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:36:12 +0000

Finally, a rational discussion by women about the pros and cons of MCDs. Many would argue that the woman that is doing everything correctly to control her male sexually should not need him to wear a chastity device. However, I have found that my husband is, at his core, untrustworthy. His penis rules him, and not the other way ’round. We went around and around the cycle of him focussing his sexual attention on images of other women for sexual gratification, me throwing him out, him crawling back promising to reform, etc. I finally resorted to forced chastity for him, and it seems to be the only way. I found that if I have absolute control over his penis, then I have his undivided attention, loyalty, devotion, etc. On the one hand, he is willing to submit to this humiliation in order to remain with me. We both know that he’d masturbate to my lingerie catalogs the first chance he’d get, so I don’t ever give him the chance. I know that there are thousands of other women who have discovered male chastity devices as a means of living happily ever after with their men.

By: nigel

nigel — Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:08:10 +0000

Is it possible that the use of male chastity cages, is a pyschological subterfuge in which the “device” creates a focal point for the flacid penis and metaphoricaly enlarging it into a psuedo-erection? Therefore surrender through CBT becomes a new method of subverting female sexuality by not only martyring male orgasm but making the penis not the vagina the centre of attention.

There maybe a historical fashion precedent with the use of cod peices in Elizabethan male clothing. Please note the irony in the feminine title of the era.