Gender Parity & Female Domination
I’ve seen it said that as one of the main goals of female liberation is met there be more female led relationships.
I.e., that as women and men are able to live as socioeconomic equals more women will come to be or - or accept that they are - dominant in their marriages, romancing and dating.
I could also imagine it argued that as the sexes become social, political and economic equals some of the forces that make some men submissive and others dominant will diminish.
Reader, what do you think?
Loading ...
April 24th, 2008 at 4:53 am
This would be an interesting data point to chart over time, if that is at all possible in the first place.
I think equality is a necessary component of consensual submission and dominance, so all this says to me is that more people will be comfortable in accepting whatever role they really want. I hope gender parity does away with the wives who feel as though they should be dominant just to satisfy their husband’s fantasies, as well as brings about acceptance for those who choose to do so because it’s what they really want.
Because if being dominant is not what those women really want, then I’m not interested in being submissive to them. And that should be okay, too.
April 28th, 2008 at 6:35 pm
i think that the title “hubby” is sweet and appropriate in a female led marriage. i would love to be referred to as”my darling little hubby” by woman of power.
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:56 am
I think that as feminism continues to grow, there will naturally be more female led marriages/relationships. I think that today men are generally more submissive than in the past largely because women have gained more status and authority in the work force and other venues. I run my business but my wife runs every other aspect of my life. I would do anything for her. If one of the goals of the feminist movement is to have more female led marriges/relationships, then that is fine with me.
May 4th, 2008 at 12:21 am
I suspect the key to increasing the ratio of dominant women to submissive men is less feminism and more sexual tolerance. Women tend to be more restricted by social mores (for whatever reason–I won’t go into that here) so as long as BDSM is reviled, many women will find it easier to either take the submissive role (nicely passive and with an element of deniability–unlike being dominant which is ALL ABOUT owning your desires) or just forgo BDSM play entirely. When BDSM becomes mainstream, that’s when you’re going to get more women blossoming into dominance.
May 5th, 2008 at 9:14 pm
I´ve been talking to my wife asking to be dominant women having a free day going to bachelorttes party to see strep tease for women, also having a menage a trois MWM, or to going to the bar seated far from me ang get a boy friend for a while but it´s very difficult to her to accept.
PP
November 18th, 2008 at 7:50 pm
As Womyn gain more power they will want to do what ever they want to do.That includes identifying as being submissive.After all arn’t there many many males who have held the upper hand for the last few thousand years who are sexually submissive.