I’ve seen it said that as one of the main goals of female liberation is met there be more female led relationships.
I.e., that as women and men are able to live as socioeconomic equals more women will come to be or – or accept that they are – dominant in their marriages, romancing and dating.
I could also imagine it argued that as the sexes become social, political and economic equals some of the forces that make some men submissive and others dominant will diminish.
Reader, what do you think?
Originally posted 2008-04-23 19:00:56.
Related posts:
- Gender Swap or Reversal Imagine male and female gender identities or bodies being swapped...
- Female Domination & Sex & the City Samantha, Carrie, Charlotte, Miranda and [...]...
- Female Domination? Is Femdom just another part of D/s and S&M or...
- Female Sadists Cheerfully cruel women: a good thing or [...]...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Loading ...
Well … it is indeed an interesting question. As Jade mentioned above, My Mistress also doesn’t want an alpha male, She still wants a male to satisfy Her sexually but also one that will do all the chores and one that will de Her mani and pedi, play dress-up etc, etc. One that will not try to sneak out to play golf, fish or watch football – or whatever alpha males do these days. I know some women who envy my Mistress but also some who would never go for a beta male like me.
The way I see it , it is very hard to extrapolate all of this to a global scale conclusion. So honestly I have I have no idea but it will definitely be interesting to watch as this evolution takes place. I do feel, however, that it would be refreshing to see a society dominated and ruled by women. And by dominated and ruled mean the driest possible dictionary definition. Like the way today’s society is dominated and ruled predominantly by men. Although I think is is rather unrealistic on a short term scale, I would love to experience it in my lifetime – not because I may like it but because it would be different and I would get to compare “before” and “after”.
Women are not dominant as a matter of evolution, and never will be. They fought for equality, and they believe in it. Males are no more submissive than 1000 years ago. They simply have the Net and can meet others and some dominant women. They are still very very rare.
Women do tend to control relationships, because many aspects of the relationship is more important to the woman, and the man goes along with it. That’s not a FLR, as we think of the term. The male doesn’t obey the woman. He simply realizes that she is the best person to run these things; but now and then he’ll say “No,” and the reality becomes apparent that this is an equal relationship, and neither party obeys the other.
Fortunately, every male can have a FLR with every woman he meets. He simply obeys her, all of the time. She doesn’t even need to be aware of it, though at some point, over time, it will catch her attention.
When woman finally gain economic and political advantage over men i think the majority of females will no longer be interested in alpha males. when woman gain this power ( and i think it will happen over the next 30 years) they will want a supportive male, a man who respects them and will submit to their dominance. this just seems the natural course of the current womens revolution. once this change takes affect women will be the sexual predator not the male.
As Womyn gain more power they will want to do what ever they want to do.That includes identifying as being submissive.After all arn’t there many many males who have held the upper hand for the last few thousand years who are sexually submissive.
I´ve been talking to my wife asking to be dominant women having a free day going to bachelorttes party to see strep tease for women, also having a menage a trois MWM, or to going to the bar seated far from me ang get a boy friend for a while but it´s very difficult to her to accept.
PP
I suspect the key to increasing the ratio of dominant women to submissive men is less feminism and more sexual tolerance. Women tend to be more restricted by social mores (for whatever reason–I won’t go into that here) so as long as BDSM is reviled, many women will find it easier to either take the submissive role (nicely passive and with an element of deniability–unlike being dominant which is ALL ABOUT owning your desires) or just forgo BDSM play entirely. When BDSM becomes mainstream, that’s when you’re going to get more women blossoming into dominance.
I think that as feminism continues to grow, there will naturally be more female led marriages/relationships. I think that today men are generally more submissive than in the past largely because women have gained more status and authority in the work force and other venues. I run my business but my wife runs every other aspect of my life. I would do anything for her. If one of the goals of the feminist movement is to have more female led marriges/relationships, then that is fine with me.
i think that the title “hubby” is sweet and appropriate in a female led marriage. i would love to be referred to as”my darling little hubby” by woman of power.
This would be an interesting data point to chart over time, if that is at all possible in the first place.
I think equality is a necessary component of consensual submission and dominance, so all this says to me is that more people will be comfortable in accepting whatever role they really want. I hope gender parity does away with the wives who feel as though they should be dominant just to satisfy their husband’s fantasies, as well as brings about acceptance for those who choose to do so because it’s what they really want.
Because if being dominant is not what those women really want, then I’m not interested in being submissive to them. And that should be okay, too.