They say that Matriarchy will come one couple at a time and it will.Organisation at a micro level is more influential and solid than organisation at the macro level of governements and cabinets.

“I’m not really sure why that’s been addressed to me as it doesn’t actually counter, or even cover, most of the points I made.

I didn’t say I thought matriarchy was about women in leather suits, or anything about women being violent, or a great Amazon army, or any of that. I think you are arguing with someone else, and confusing them with me.

Most of my statements were actually addressed to ‘femsup’ and doris, but you can take them on board if like, provided that you actually answer them…

Basically, I just don’t see how any blueprint regarding the behavior of all men and all women towards one another can possibly satisfy everyone, or even every woman. And that is exactly what’s being talked about in some of the posts here:

I suspect that there really are few women who truly do believe in their superiority. This is a shame because every woman could so easily control almost every man.

THAT’S TOTALITARIAN. TOTALITARIAN = BAD. READ SOME HISTORY!!!!

And, I ask again, what about women who like being submissive to men? Does your scheme serve their interests? I’ve met quite a few since I started blogging and they are genuine, intelligent, good-natured individual people.

Honestly, I’d much rather read their ideas about providing love through service to their partners, than the ideas of someone, male or female, who keeps trying to proscribe what “the woman” or worse, “the female” will do, and what women will be like generally, in some kind of facile, depersonalized system where roles are allocated solely on the basis of gender.

(Got a feeling I’m wasting my breath here. This has all been done before, right.)”

Being the good submissive I think it beholden of me to satisfy my lover by dominating her when she wants/needs it.So I can see very clearly how submissive Womyn can not only exist but thrive under a Matriarchy.

Just as now we have men who are submisive to Womyn under a patriarchy why could you not have submissive Womyn enjoying life with their dominant partner under a Matriarchy.In fact they would be more able to do so with less stigma we hope.

Also men the current dominant sex in Capatalism can chose to be submissive and just serve their kink really being in the driving seat in a relationship so why wouldn’t Womyn be able to exercise that power.

Do you understand the incompatiblility between “dominance of one sex over the other” and “equality”? Please speak with logic. If you’re arguing for matriarchy, argue for matriarchy.

Matriarchy is the only replacement to patriarchy. These two systems are real, they have real structures. Equality = not real, abstraction.

Ultimately reality wins out, not abstraction.

Very simplistic. How about taking his arguments at face value.

That’s very determinstic of you, isn’t it. I thought the feminist movement was about moving away from such deterministic mindsets with regard to men and women?

Anyway, on the point of Bond, you can call him a propagandist engaging in intellectual masturbation if you like. But give it 50 years and see how right he is. Heck, 20 years. It’s not reasonable to dismiss his ideas when such little time has elapsed for them to be proven right or wrong.

Maybe people just aren’t thinking about the long term evolutionary impact of femdom? And those that do think about it inevitably conclude that matriarchy is the future (a matriarchy which will basically be an inversion of the most patriarchal patriarchal systems).

“Macho” is not a synecdoche for “nyah! nyah!”

Female dominance can promote social harmony, there have been many studies conducted on this.

Could you share links to some of the studies or refer to their source in some other way?

Thanks.