Comments on: Mistress Sarah Palin

By: subhubbyboy

subhubbyboy — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:14:32 +0000

My wife/mistress made me vote for the PALIN ticket.
I was punished when she lost.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:23:35 +0000

H Clinton is a man

By: tacslave

tacslave — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:58:24 +0000

Yea the effect’s of the female hormonal soup as oppossed to the huge amount of testosterone in men. For men its positives are strength and spatial intellect, and Women its empathy and communication. Both genders have negative’s from their unique hormone’s but even there the mens negatives are much worse. Is the only thing you know about Women the clitoris and vagina Enoch!!!?

By: Joe

Joe — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:36:39 +0000

Ms. Palin would be an excellent president. Not only is she intelligent and experienced, but she’s also beautiful. She would be a great roll model for other women and would help men admit that women are the superior gender. Also, she would be showing those crazy Muslims that times have changed.

By: Enoch Soames

Enoch Soames — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:40:00 +0000

Biological attributes? Clitoris, vagina?

By: tacslave

tacslave — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:02:40 +0000

Hilary or/and Sarah as a mistress is a good fantasy but Women don’t have to be smarter to be superior. One must look to a persons talents… is she good enough to be President? Nope, I dont think Obama is either. The point of Female Supremacy is about the feminine attributes being better for the future world.. intelligence is too individually diverse to have either gender broadly considered more intelligent then the other. Both sexes are good at different things… its just IMO the future would benefit much more from the feminine biological attributes then the male ones.

By: Dev

Dev — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:16:22 +0000

I’ll stick to H. Clinton, thanks…