Comments on: Train Male Children to Be Submissive

By: Jessie

Jessie — Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:00:14 +0000

I agree that children will copy their role parental models. Starting out at birth, they will do it without question. Whatever it is, it’s the norm. Mom was the absolute authority in our home. Dad asked her for permission for everything. Hence, my three brothers grew up submissive while my younger sister were confident in our dominant role. In the evening when mom wanted some alone time or just got annoyed with dad; she’d “it’s time for you to go to bed. Whatever dad was doing, he’d stop and meekly go to bed, even if it was still light. I picked up on this, and when I was 10 and going through puberty, I started sending my brothers to bed. Even thought my older brother was 13, he meekly went to bed. He may not have like it anymore than Dad, but he did it without question. This was a defining period in our development, were we girls assumed our dominate responsibilities, and our brothers surrendered to their submissive positions.
Sometime when dad would get out of line, Mom would raise an eyebrow and bring him up short. You could see the fear in his eyes. I figured out that he was going to get a spanking at night. I’d listen. One night when I was upset with my brother, I took him to listen. Then we just looked at each other and went back to my room where I delivered my first spanking to my older brother’s bare butt. My point is that kids learn from their role models. We also learned that Mom loved dad very much.

By: tom

tom — Mon, 17 May 2010 18:58:55 +0000

well i dont see anything bad about being exposed to a female controled household i am a sub male who grew up serving mom and my three sisters as i was the only male in the house they had a lot of fun at my expence

By: RonsWorld

RonsWorld — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:26:24 +0000

I think we all bring our kids up to accept the social norms that we follow ourselves. This involves teaching them such basics as do not steal, do not be greedy and don’t bully your siblings etc. We use all kinds of methods to get those messages accepted by our kids. In the past we used physical discipline now in our politically correct Western world we use non violent ways like naughty steps or chairs. But take a look at the state of our schools and you can see that the latter methods is not always successful.

Is it so bad therefore, if our family unit deliberately incorporates the mother as the head of the family, to bring up the sons of that family to respect that norm too and if some form of discipline is also used to maintain the female leadership, should that not also be considered appropriate for the male children? This is no different than the requirement of strict religious adherence in a religiously devout family.

By: someguy

someguy — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:41:54 +0000

I hope your countries respective authorities are monitoring this site for peadophilia. Linda you are talking about involving children in a sexual pointed relationship. Think about that, it will not be hard for a decent lawyer to link your fetish to your treatment of a child.

By: Ray

Ray — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:34:16 +0000

I find it interesting in a world that wants things to be equal you have women that want to be in control and then you have men that want to be in control. This is choice between two adults and each relationship is different. It is and always will be the nature order of things that men from a DNA point of view, are the more dominate gender. Women have slowly been allowing themselves to be ok with enjoying sex. The family unit has been slowly falling apart because of divorce, men and women not being there for their family and this has in many cases allow men to experience their growth through the eyes of women leading the family. Like it was mentioned, girls have been brought up to be submissive to their husbands, this is taught and their DNA is more in line with the nuturing and caring of the family. So the same stands true of a boy, he will mature into what he has experienced within his environment. But a boy has DNA that is more agressive and the brain of a boy is no the same as a girl that is taught to be submissive. Genders are different and their brains develop in totally different ways.
So now all the ladies out that are mad or what to spank me to put me in line, think for a moment. A child should never have to experience the world of adults until they are emotionally prepared. A child’s evironment can lead to the same normal way that a person handles an abnormal situation. Be it abusive parents or a combat veteran. Let me say it again, A person can have a normal reaction to an abnormal situation. Let me now add for you, a male has DNA to allow him to be agressive, rough and what to play hard. To train him to serve, be submissive, and women are his superior before he is emotionally grown enough to understand himself and what he needs falls inline with him having a normal reaction to an abnormal situation. He will be confused, emotional immature and deep inside him, he will feel out of sort with himself.
Dad and Mom can love each other in which ever way they need to work together to make their relationship work, but I to train a girl or boy to be anything other than loved, they are belived in, they can become anything they choose to and the must have the develop from both parents that shows them how to succeed in life since they have been given the tools of being accountable for their actions, they must deal with life and understand that life can be cruel to anyone. Learn from it so you can become a better person.

My final comment is a question, two people can be equal, why can’t two people that really love each other be submissive to each other, live teamwork with each other and always make your partner a priority.

By: Dad with a Boy

Dad with a Boy — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:28:18 +0000

Linda, as a woman, you are as dangerous to the human condition as any male rapist. You want to abuse children’s testicles and castrate men regardless of how they treat women (you are a twisted, demented psycho). You should not be allowed the honor of children. lf any person suggests removing the procreative abilities of another person that person suggesting that is THE PROBLEM. I don’t have a problem with FDR, I do have a problem with any person who is sadistic to any human. Get a grip, get over your insane anger, and get a grip before you ever think about breeding. Spouting like yours does a disservice to FDR.

By: brendon

brendon — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:10:51 +0000

my mother brought me up to believe in female superiority and put dresses on me when i was young and i accept woman now as superior to me .

By: bobbie030

bobbie030 — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:34:19 +0000

i’m not necessarily advocating raising submissive boys, but why would that be any different than raising girls to be submissive as they have been basically throughout history….. what’s good for the gander is good for the goose?…..

By: FLR & Cuckold Male

FLR & Cuckold Male — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:24:55 +0000

Linda – I think there are two things going on in your argument: How open should a FD relationship be for the children of the family and should the boys in such a family also be made part of the female’s domination?

From your own family experiences it seems that your mother had no difficulties with the later question and even though she may have had her suspicions that you inventing situations in order to have your brother punished, she almost colluded with you. That and your observation of the mother smacking her son’s genitals outside the restaurant are probably quite extreme on the side of being unambiguous about what FD meant for the two women involved.

I believe that in a more median FD household the children are fully aware that the mother rules and that the father acquiesces. It is inevitable that any girls in that family environment will grow up to emulate their mother and the boys will grow up to emulate their father. To say that the children should be left to find themselves misses reality. I don’t think there is any controversy in this.

Where there is obviously controversy is if physical punishment is used as part of the FD and should that extend to the boys of the family. If physical discipline is used by the wife on the husband is definitely an issue for them and I have no moral issues at all with the use of semi concensual physical discipline within a relationship. The issue of the FD wife punishing her husband in front of the kids is more complex as is the wife’s punishing any boys in the family as part of her FD.

In conclusion; In an FD household the children will be acutely aware of the power differences between male and females in the home therefore they will be fundamentally affected by that in their value systems as they grow up. If the family have open discipline rituals for the male members this will definitely reinforce the children’s attitudes to FD as they develop through their childhood. Is that desirable or damaging? To be honest, I am with Linda, as long as it doesn’t turn into sexual abuse, why shouldn’t the FD lifestyle be displayed openly and why shouldn’t the boys of the family not be expected to conform to those rules too with their accompanying disciplining.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:31:07 +0000

No parent has the right to try and force their beliefs (especially when specifically related to their sexual lifestyle choices) on their children. People make the mistake of thinking that they have the right to mold children as they see fit – which they don’t. Kids deserve to grow up in a loving home where they can choose to become whatever or whomever they wish.